Advocate Online In
the Know
More Students Work More Hours
College students facing a long-term
erosion in financial aid are working longer hours at the expense of their
education, notes a recent study.
Many students sitting in lecture halls
and seminar rooms of America's universities are struggling to lead double
lives, according to a recent study. Besides being full-time students,
they are also full-time or nearly full-time workers.
Researchers Tracey King and Ellynne Bannon,
sifting through data collected by the United States Department of Education,
discovered that three-quarters of students work while going to college.
Of the students who work, the researchers report, nearly half put in 25
hours or more per week. And the trend is toward more students working
more hours.
King and Bannon attribute this to student
aid failing to keep pace with costs. The average student aid grant at
a four-year public institution is now one-third smaller compared with
tuition than it was 20 years ago. The King-Bannon study was funded by
the Higher Education Project of the state Public Interest Research Groups.
Not surprisingly, King and Bannon report
that low-income students are much more likely to work long hours than
high-income students.
Does all this work hurt students' education?
Many students think so. The researchers report that large numbers of students
who work 25 hours and up say that work limits their choice of classes
and the course load they can handleand hurts their grades.
Besides, the authors add, college education
is more than taking classes. "Higher education is not simply a means
to achieve higher earning potential, it should also be a life enriching
experience. Colleges and universities foster both academic and personal
developmentfrom community service and civic engagement," they
write.
But a student who works 25 hours a week
is probably devoting 60 to 80 hours a week to work and study, which doesn't
leave time for anything else.
King and Bannon warn that with the current
belt-tightening in both state and federal governments, the situation is
likely to get worse. They recommend that Congress boost need-based federal
grants to students, especially Pell Grants. They also want more federal
dollars earmarked for the Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant (SEOG)
program and for the Leveraging Educational Assistance Partnership (LEAP)
program.
For more, read At What Cost? at
www.pirg.org/inpirg/incampus.asp?id2=6478.
| From The
Lectern |
| In his
1876 inaugural address as the first president of the Johns Hopkins
University, Daniel Coit Gilman predicted that the advent of the
modern research university would lead to "less misery among the
poor, less ignorance in schools, less bigotry in the temple, less
suffering in the hospital, less fraud in business, less folly in
politics." Gilman's vision is easy to dismiss as a naive expression
of 19th-century liberalism. But it also is a generous and courageous
statement of the social responsibility of colleges and universities
in a democratic society.
Gordon
K. Davies, Chronicle of Higher Education, The Chronicle Review,
November 30, 2001 |
|