Site Map
Calendar
Join our lists and receive site news!
 
Return to Higher Ed home page
  Contact Higher Ed
Higher Ed Conference
Guide to HE Site
  Table of Contents
October 2002
Advocate Online
They're Talking On Campus...
On the Road
Action Line
In the Know
From Capitol to Campus
NEA Affiliates in Action
Thriving in Academe
Higher Education News
The Dialogue
Speaking Out
Previous Advocate Issues



Advocate Online

Thriving in Academe

Issues to Consider

Student, Assess Thyself
Self-evaluation lets students integrate their own experiences with what they are learning.

Does student self-evaluation help students retain their learning more effectively?
We believe that it does. To have a real impact on the students learning must be meaningful by changing the frame through which they see the world or by being applicable to everyday matters of concern to students. The reflection process is critical to learning in this way.

Is student self-evaluation useful for all types of students?
It has been used successfully with both adult students and students of traditional college age. Student self evaluation allows students to bring their own experiences to the table and to integrate them with what they are learning. This is especially critical for students from marginalized groups, such as students of color, women, and working class students, whose own life experience may not be well represented in the curricular material. However there may be cultural differences in comfort level with self disclosure.

Are any institution-wide structures necessary to provide a context for effective and meaningful student self-evaluation?
Student self evaluation can occur in many contexts, with or without institutional support. It helps when the institution develops a culture of student self-evaluation, and students have many opportunities to practice it. Some colleges and universities have developed courses that support student self-reflection such as the Art of Learning class at Antioch Seattle, the Ways of Knowing class at Seattle Central Community College, or the “Summary and Evaluation” course for graduating seniors at Fairhaven College at Western Washington University, Bellingham. At large universities like Washington State University, individual instructors have also developed effective approaches to student self-evaluation within individual courses or departments. For example, faculty members in architecture ask students to write about what they are learning from keeping design journals. Writing faculty at other institutions have encourage brief “post-writes,” in which students respond to a variety of questions such as: What problems did you find as you wrote this assignment?

Could student self-evaluation contribute to outcomes assessment?
Our colleagues Bill Moore and Steve Hunter have made a strong case for including student self-evaluations in outcomes assessment, drawing on their work at The Evergreen State College and State Board for Community and Technical Colleges in Washington State. A number of schools, including Evergreen and Antioch, have begun to utilize student self-assessments in this way.

return to "Thriving in Academe"




Search NEA Higher Ed


References & Resources

Our collaboration through the Washington Center led to Student Self-Evaluation: Fostering Reflective Learning, published as part of the Jossey-Bass New Directions for Teaching and Learning series in 1993. We learned a lot from the folks we worked with and recommend it as a comprehensive guide to the subject. In it, Carl Walconis surveys the variety of forms self-evaluations take, and Jean MacGregor explores the challenges students face in learning to write them. Marie Eaton and Rita Pougiales discuss the conditions that support writing self-assessments, and William Moore and Steve Hunter explore their potential for outcomes assessment research. Finally, Richard Haswell explores the use of writing self-assessments as both demonstrators and inducers of developmental change in students.

We also found value in a number of different ideas as we explored the practice of student self-evaluation. Two in particular offer a place to start. Belenky, Clinchy, Goldberger, and Tarule, in Women’s Ways of Knowing (1986), expand on William Perry’s (1970) foundational work on intellectual and ethical development and examine more closely issues of voice, identity, and authority, particularly as they relate to women.
Although quite dense, David Kolb’s Experiential Learning offers an incredible synthesis of ideas from a wide variety of sources and gives a picture of learning as a dynamic, holistic process wherein learning is transformed into knowledge and knowledge into action—with the art of reflection as the key.


   ^ Back to Top
 

NEA 1201 16TH Street, NW Washington, DC 20036  |  Tel. 202.833.4000
Privacy Statement | Report problems to: HEwebmaster@nea.org