Site Map
Calendar
Join our lists and receive site news!
 
Return to Higher Ed home page
  Contact Higher Ed
Higher Ed Conference
Guide to HE Site
  Table of Contents
December 2003
Advocate Online
They're Talking On Campus...
On the Road
Action Line
In the Know
From Capitol to Campus
NEA Affiliates in Action
Thriving in Academe
Higher Education News
The Dialogue
Speaking Out
Previous Advocate Issues



Advocate Online

In the Know

Bridging Barriers to Success

Even though 70 percent of American high school grads go to college within two years, many arrive on campus unaware of basic expectations and toting a backpack of misconceptions.

Many high school students think getting into college is the hardest part of their academic work or that taking easy high school classes and receiving good grades is better preparation for college than taking more rigorous academic classes. Why the confusion?

Students and families receive conflicting information from high schools and colleges, according to “Betraying the College Dream: How Disconnected K–12 and Postsecondary Education Systems Undermine Student Aspirations,” a six-year national study conducted by Stanford University’s The Bridge Project.

"We think these students are set up to fail,” says Michael Kirst, a Stanford professor of education and principal investigator. “They graduate high school and enter the dark continent of educational testing. Of the 49 states that have K–12 standards, not one conferred with public higher education systems as to how they should be teaching the students.”

The Bridge Project labels the current educational system “fractured” and believes states have created unnecessary barriers for students entering college. Researchers found African-American and Latino students at a greater disadvantage because they are not graduating with the same level of skills as their white non-Latino counterparts.

Approximately half the students entering college had to take remedial courses. “We expected to find some disjuncture,” says Kirst, “but the unpreparedness at the community college level was worse than we expected.”

Kirst feels that the focus of the media and high school counseling and outreach programs on selective institutions promotes misconceptions and that media, policy, and research should pay more attention to the kinds of colleges the majority of students attend.

Further recommendations for improvement include allowing students to take placement exams in high school, so they can better understand college-level expectations; sequencing undergraduate general education requirements so they are linked with appropriate senior year high school courses; and expanding successful concurrent enrollment programs between high schools and colleges so they don’t just include traditional college-bound students.

The full Bridge Project report is online at www.stanford.edu/group/bridgeproject.

From The Lectern

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the Congress—

(1) recognizes the contributions of over three-quarters of a million part-time and adjunct faculty, full-time non-tenure-track faculty, and graduate employees who teach in colleges and universities across the United States;

(2) supports the efforts of organizations to raise public awareness of the conditions in which these contingent employees work; and

(3) supports solutions which provide fair and equitable treatment for contingent employees in higher education and promote the return to a significant and stable corps of full-time, tenure-track faculty in United States institutions of higher education.

—submitted by Dale Kildee (D-MI), October 28, 2003




Search NEA Higher Ed



   ^ Back to Top
 

NEA 1201 16TH Street, NW Washington, DC 20036  |  Tel. 202.833.4000
Privacy Statement | Report problems to: HEwebmaster@nea.org