Site Map
Calendar
Join our lists and receive site news!
 
Return to Higher Ed home page
  Contact Higher Ed
Higher Ed Conference
Guide to HE Site
  Table of Contents
April 2004
Advocate Online
They're Talking On Campus...
On the Road
Action Line
In the Know
From Capitol to Campus
NEA Affiliates in Action
Thriving in Academe
Higher Education News
The Dialogue
Speaking Out
Previous Advocate Issues



Advocate Online

Thriving in Academe

Issues To Consider

Saving Time in the Grading Process
Four questions to enhance your efficiency.

1. What aspects waste my time? Like the back-of-the-envelope reminders provided by utility companies (e.g., “Did you sign your check?”), I require students to submit, with each assignment, a completed checksheet with items such as “Did you read X and Y before writing the paper? Did you spend at least X hours on the paper, over at least X days? Did you proofread the paper twice and have another person proofread it? Did you underline your thesis sentence? Does the rest of your paper support that thesis?” Put on the checksheet all those items that students can self-check and that save you time. I refuse to accept any paper where the student has not fulfilled all the conditions, because it doesn’t have the student investment that merits my investment. I go through the checksheet thoroughly in class and offer to help students with any aspect of it before the paper is due. But I don’t back down on the requirement, because they will face plenty of demanding situations in their professional lives, where things have to be done right and on time.

2. What’s the big picture? If the student has spent enough time, has read the appropriate material, and has proofread appropriately and the paper is still bad, the student either lacks prerequisite skills or has misunderstood the assignment. Address these problems, rather than marking every error. Does the student need a tutor? Re-assignment to a lower-level course? Do you need to institute a preliminary check of early student work to catch early misunderstandings?

3. What can the student absorb and use? Teacher effort can be wasted unless it reaches the student at a teachable moment. When you are giving final grades that cannot be changed, use a checksheet or rubric to quickly illustrate strengths and weaknesses, and write a comment that will guide the student for the future; your line-by-line comments are probably wasted. Even if you must reduce the total number of assignments in your class, it is often worthwhile to respond to student drafts, because then you create a teachable moment when your comments matter.

4. Does every student need this? Don’t give every student what only some students need. Along with your checksheet and advice-for-the-future comments on final graded papers, offer in a truly inviting and friendly way that any student who wishes can come to your office for a line-by-line discussion of the paper’s strengths and weaknesses. Then you can invest that time for the students who really want it.

return to "Thriving in Academe"




Search NEA Higher Ed


References & Resources

Fink, L. Dee. 2003. Creating Significant Learning Experiences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Guides readers through the process of course design, teaching, and self-improvement. Includes assessment and feedback that goes beyond just grading, as well as principles for establishing an effective grading system.

Walvoord, Barbara E. and Virginia Johnson Anderson. 1998. Effective Grading: A Tool for Learning and Assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Guides teachers in establishing effective classroom assignments, teaching, and grading practices. Illustrates how to use classroom assessment for departmental and general-education assessment. Includes a chapter case study of general-education assessment in a community college by Lesta Cooper-Freytag, Barbara E. Walvoord, and Janice Denton.

Walvoord, Barbara E. 2004. Assessment Clear and Simple: A Practical Guide for Institutions, Departments, and General Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

In 80 pages, demonstrates how to conduct assessment that is feasible, sensible, and useful to the institution, as well as meeting the needs of accreditors and other external audiences. Chapters for institution-wide planners, for departments, and for those assessing general education.

Wiggins, Grant P. 1993. Assessing Student Performance: Exploring the Purpose and Limits of Testing. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

A thoughtful critique of standard testing practices such as scoring on a curve and using testing merely for audit rather than for feedback. Suggests how to use testing to improve learning.


   ^ Back to Top
 

NEA 1201 16TH Street, NW Washington, DC 20036  |  Tel. 202.833.4000
Privacy Statement | Report problems to: HEwebmaster@nea.org