Site Map
Calendar
Join our lists and receive site news!
 
Return to Higher Ed home page
  Contact Higher Ed
Higher Ed Conference
Guide to HE Site
  Table of Contents
April 2004
Advocate Online
They're Talking On Campus...
On the Road
Action Line
In the Know
From Capitol to Campus
NEA Affiliates in Action
Thriving in Academe
Higher Education News
The Dialogue
Speaking Out
Previous Advocate Issues



Advocate Online

Speaking Out

The Higher Education Act of 1965

The current Higher Education Act (HEA) will expire during the 108th Congress. This act, originally passed in 1965, is administered through regulations developed by the Department of Education and funds and directs the federal government’s role in public higher education.

The initial act of 1965 included grants and loans for students from low- and middle- income families. In the years since, seven re-authorizations have expanded and modified programs impacting a variety of students. The act currently funds programs such as GEAR-UP and TRIO, Pell grants, and loans such as Stafford and Perkins. With every re-authorization, each program is subject to elimination or to various changes in eligibility, interest rates, and repayment schedules.

The current reauthorization follows on the legislative heels of the largest federal government intrusion into education ever—the Elementary Secondary Education Act (ESEA), labeled by President Bush as “No Child Left Behind”—and requires that our higher ed members monitor its progress.

Despite the small percentage of federal dollars in the K–12 budgets, the impact of ESEA has been significant. By contrast, the federal government provides approximately 70 percent of financial aid to more than 8 million postsecondary students. Given this background, this reauthorization has the potential to either enhance or compromise the integrity of public higher education and the work that our members do.

Affordability and accountability are clearly among the key legislative concerns. Some in Congress want to enhance educational access by increasing the amounts of grants and loans and expanding loan forgiveness for teachers.

Others believe the federal government provides sufficient funding but needs to provide more bureaucratic oversight. There is also interest in assessing graduation rates and the academic preparation of students in the schools of education.

The HEA is now cloaked in the fog of the 2004 presidential election. The next president will influence the legislation and will direct the Department of Education’s regulatory process. To protect our students and public higher education, we must speak out on both the legislative soap box and the November ballot box!

speaking out pictureMike Ryan, a professor of microbiology at Ferris State University and a member of the Michigan Association for Higher Education, serves on the NEA Board as an at-large director representing higher education.

 




Search NEA Higher Ed


I'd like to say!
Regarding the dialogue on the use of student evaluations (February Advocate), faculty are expert evaluators who can separate a performance from our feelings about the performer. We would assign a grade of “A” to a well-written paper, even if we disagree with its opinions and dislike the writer.

Students often don’t operate in that world. They can downgrade fine teaching performances because of personality conflicts or their feelings about the course content.

Evaluations that affect tenure and promotions should be conducted by experts only, leaving student evaluations for “advice” and “information.”

—Marvin Coates
El Paso (TX) Community College

I share the concerns of both Schwetman and Bartlett (February Dialogue) regarding the use and abuse of teaching evaluations.

My concern is that we avoid addressing these evaluations at a superficial level.

Student evaluations of instruction can be one set of measurements of teaching performance considered in a Promotion and Tenure review but only when part of a comprehensive evaluation of teaching performance, based in a teaching paradigm that recognizes the appropriate roles of both student and faculty in the classroom.

—Harold Daniel
University of Maine

Share your opinion
Write to the editor at: Clehane@nea.org


   ^ Back to Top
 

NEA 1201 16TH Street, NW Washington, DC 20036  |  Tel. 202.833.4000
Privacy Statement | Report problems to: HEwebmaster@nea.org