| |

|
Advocate Online
Speaking Out
Protecting Faculty Who Teach
This is about a bargaining unit under pressure from a university president hell-bent on gaining prestige. As with many presidents, prestige means scholarly publications, and the use of tenure and promotion as instruments to press faculty to publish more.
When President Roy J. Nirschel arrived at Roger Williams University, a private institution of some 3,500 students and 180 full-time faculty, he quickly moved to improve the university’s reputation, with considerable success. But this included increasing emphasis on scholarly publication, evidenced by his denying, in a single academic year, one faculty member tenure and four faculty members promotion, all for purportedly inadequate scholarship. The five faculty members filed grievances, and all five are proceeding toward arbitration.
Our collective bargaining agreement protects our faculty from overly aggressive demands for scholarly production. It prohibits encouraging “a publish or perish atmosphere” and it emphatically prioritizes teaching. The agreement defines scholarship broadly, including under scholarship such activity as conference presentations, professional workshops, reviews and artistic exhibitions.
All five of the scholarship-related grievances arise from the administration ignoring or evading these provisions of the contract.
The administration’s approach reflects several perhaps common problems with a prestige-driven leadership. First is a narrowly rigid conception of scholarship, understood exclusively as peer-reviewed research articles published in scholarly research journals. Second is the inadequate resources the administration provides faculty to support its narrow (and costly) notion of scholarship. Opportunities for in-house funding and for reduction in the standard 4 - 4 teaching load are minimal.
Third is the failure of the deans to make clear to faculty applying for tenure or promotion what is expected of them in terms of number, type, or frequency of publication required for tenure or promotion. Related to this are deans who encourage faculty members to take on major service only to be denied tenure or promotion because the time should have been devoted to publishing.
We believe the RWUFA agreement protects faculty from an administration burdening faculty with unreasonable publishing demands. The union is now going to arbitration, testing whether an administration may evade those protections in its search for prestige.
Mel A. Topf is president of the Roger Williams University Faculty Association. He teaches professional writing. His doctorate is in literature but he publishes mainly on legal communication and history. He recently received a law degree. |
 |
 |
| |
| 
I'd like to say!
Regarding the Dialogue (February Advocate) between Jay Gordon and RoseMary Hays-Thomas concerning academic freedom to choose textbooks, I think there can be both a Yes and a No response.
If, for example, a professor is teaching the first level of French or Spanish, it appears practical that all colleagues use the same appropriate text so that there can be continuity when the student goes on to the next level of the language.
On the other hand, since I am the only professor teaching in my area, it is I alone who makes the decision on what texts and materials should be used. Students who complete my basic class continue on with me for two additional semesters and it is essential that they be all prepared from the same textbook. I would never permit anyone to dictate to me what books and materials I can use. And if I wish to deviate from my subject on occasion, I am perfectly free to do so without comment from anyone.
— Esor Ben-Sorek
Queensborough Community College (NY)
The single word in Jay L. Gordon’s response to the question “Does the use of departmentally chosen textbooks limit the academic freedom of individual faculty members?” (Feb. Advocate) that makes his entire answer suspect is the word “suggests.”
That is hedging and naive. To believe that “a department has deliberated” is naive, as quite often it is not the case when choosing and assigning textbooks. “Departmentally” does not suggest the reality that he implies.
—Jack B. Garrison
University of Nebraska at Kearney
Share
your opinion
Write to the editor at:
Clehane@nea.org
|
|
|
 |
|
|