Site Map
Calendar
Join our lists and receive site news!
 
Return to Higher Ed home page
  Contact Higher Ed
Higher Ed Conference
Guide to HE Site
  Table of Contents
December 2007
Advocate Online
They're Talking On Campus...
On the Road
Action Line
In the Know
From Capitol to Campus
NEA Affiliates in Action
Thriving in Academe
Higher Education News
The Dialogue
Speaking Out
Previous Advocate Issues




Advocate Online

Thriving in Academe
Issues To Consider

Holding Students Accountable

The options are endless, the results unexpectedly positive.

Aside from study questions and problems to solve, what other forms of homework are possible?
The best selections depend upon the content of the readings, but the possible student products are endless: notes on the readings, answers to standard reading-response questions, a concept or mind map, a matrix for compare-and-contrast content, and outside material that shows the relevance or examples of the readings.

An underutilized homework option is to have students construct objective items that demand higher order thinking for possible use in future tests. You’ll have to teach students how to write good items and how to distinguish higher-order thinking from mere recall. But once you do, you’ll never have to write another objective test again! You’ll get good items because students will want you to choose theirs for the tests. After all, they know the answers to their own test items!

If you want to extend the homework into in-class activities, have your students submit one copy electronically before class and bring a hard copy to class. Then they can present their homework or call on other students to answer the test items they wrote.

What kinds of in-class writing activities will work?
Consider having students write a short “paper” on the readings at the beginning of class: a “one-minute” take on the readings’ most important points, a reading response piece, an audience-directed paraphrase, or a simple summary. Students can also draw a summary in a concept map, matrix, or other appropriate graphic. Or they can work on objective test questions. My personal favorite is the daily, five-to-10-minute “mind dump,” where students write down everything they can remember from the readings. Why will they bother? Because you will give them back their “dumps” during the tests.

But will my students hate me?
Not at all! They will probably respect and even like you more, since you’ve shown them that you understand their learning challenges and motivations. Many students will even find themselves enjoying the readings once they learn how to tackle them. Consider the positive experiences of two colleagues in the Best Practices section. In fact, daily quizzes are a student favorite (Thompson, 2002; Connor-Greene, 2000). After instituting them, several Clemson faculty have had me interview their classes for the mid-semester “verdict,” and uniformly students have applauded daily quizzes. Who would have thought?

This suggests that our students actually enjoy learning but lack the self-discipline to do for its own sake. They look to us for the discipline, so let’s furnish it.

return to "Thriving in Academe"




Search NEA Higher Ed


References & Resources

Adler, M.J. (1940). How to Read a Book: The Art of Getting a Liberal Edu-cation. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Blue, T. (2003, March 13). “I Don’t Know HOW to Read This Book!” The Irascible Professor. Retrieved October 2, 2007 from
http://irascibleprofessor.com/ comments-03-14-03.epr.htm.

Boyd, D.R. (n.d.). "Using Textbooks Effectively: Getting Students to Read Them." Teaching Resources, Association for Psychological Science. Retrieved October 2, 2007, from www.
psychologicalscience.org/ teaching/tips/tips_0603.html
.

Connor-Greene, P.A. (2000). “Assessing and Promoting Student Learning: Blurring the Line between Teaching and Testing.” Teaching of Psychology, 27, 2, 84-88.

Hobson, E.H. (2004). IDEA Paper #40, “Getting Students to Read: Fourteen Tips.” Retrieved October 2, 2007, from www.idea.ksu.edu

Maleki, R.B., & Heerman, C.E. (1992). IDEA Paper #26: “Improving Student Reading.” Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development.

McLaughlin, G.H. (2006). “SMOG: Simple Measure of Gobbledygook” (Readability Calculator). Retrieved October 9, 2007 from
www.harrymclaughlin.com/ SMOG.htm

Nathan, R. (2005). My Freshman Year: What a Professor Learned by Becoming a Student. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Rio Salado College. (n.d.). Textbook Study Strategies. Retrieved October 2, 2007, from www.rio.maricopa.edu/
distance_learning/tutorials/ study/textbook.shtml?
printversion.

Thompson, B. (2002, June 21). “If I Quiz Them, They Will Come.” Chronicle of Higher Education, 48, 41, B5.

Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.


   ^ Back to Top
 

NEA 1201 16TH Street, NW Washington, DC 20036  |  Tel. 202.833.4000
Privacy Statement | Report problems to: HEwebmaster@nea.org