QUICK CLICKS:

Higher Ed Home


Table of Contents
Jan.'99

Advocate Online

They're talking on campus...

On the Road

Action Line

In the Know

From Capital to Campus

NEA Affiliates in Action

Thriving in Academe

Higher Education News

Money Savvy

The Dialogue

Speak out

Current Issue

Archived Issues

News on our site. Join our interactive community and mailing lists Surf our annotated links Technology in higher education Unions Tenure Envision the future of higher education

Reflections on The Ratings

Tales from Real Life

I provide evaluation services for my own and other institutions.

One department chair who wanted to rank faculty in his department asked me to produce reports of average student rating scores to the third decimal point.

Assuming this level of precision is greatly overestimating the discriminating power of ratings and is grossly unfair to the faculty.

--Jennifer Franklin, University of Arizona

Quite a bit of my time as a faculty developer is spent in individual consultation with faculty members, generally on the topic of teaching effectiveness.

All too frequently it happens that a faculty member walks into my office, sits down, and says something like, "My average score was a 2.85, and my department chair says I have to get an average of 3.5 by the end of next semester. How can I do this?"

This is not exactly what we mean by faculty development.

--Anonymous


Post your comments on our "Thriving in Academe" discussion board.

Back to Thriving in Academe


nea's address