NEAHigher Ed.

NEA Search

Contents by
Section: March 1998

Front Page
Lead Story
They're talking on campus...
On the Road
ActionLine NEA
In the Know
From Capital to Campus
NEA Affilitates in Action
Higher Education News
Money Savvy
The Dialogue
Thriving in Academe


Last Issue


Archived Issues

Hot Topics
In The News
DialogueQuestion: Faculty senates and faculty unions both claim to represent faculty. Is there an inherent conflict between these two faculty groups?
Yes, there is an inherent conflict by Conor Johnston*

Dedicated union people can and do serve both on the senate and in the union, but the very fact that the faculty is represented by two bodies, each with its particular relationship to administration, leaves potential for conflict.
Mandates may be different---working conditions for the union and academic governance for the senate---but when concerns overlap, potential conflict can become actual conflict.
There are also doubts in the minds of union activists as to how far the senate can remain independent of administration
On two Massachusetts campuses recently, the administration attempted to circumvent the union by discussing contractual matters with the senate, which they surmised to be a more malleable body. In both cases, the union's reaction was swift and effective.
Ultimately, there would be little conflict if the biggest problem facing today's public higher education faculty were solved. That problem is that we are locked in near-perennial, debilitating conflict with frequently incompetent and insensitive employers, over the issues of fair pay and decent working conditions.
Were the professoriate given the respect that it deserves, then the energy of all faculty, union-oriented and senate-oriented, could be directed to where it primarily and properly belongs---the intellectual development of our students and ourselves.
No, there is no inherent senate-union conflict.
by Trudy Carpenter*

Both senate and union forums can advance student learning and respond to faculty concerns---when the faculty senate is composed only of faculty, and a strong local union is in place.
Before we unionized in 1969, our college president appointed faculty as well as administrators to the senate, which was chaired by an administrator.
Today, our faculty senate is composed only of faculty, chosen by their own academic departments, and is governed only by faculty---in fact, the same officers who lead our Association. That's the good news.
The bad news is that the administration took back the power to make many critical decisions when the faculty senate became truly a faculty body. Unfortunately, this means that we now have very little control over academic decisions on our campus, except what we have been able to negotiate in the contract.
Without the authority to make key academic decisions, faculty, both inside and outside the senate, can find themselves in the realm of "virtual power," where they are constantly invited to give input but lack the actual power to propel decisions into implementation.
How do we end conflict between senate and faculty?
We need to negotiate academic decision making into our Association contracts and more closely coordinate the work of faculty unions and senates.

* Conor Johnston is a professor of English at Massasoit Community College in Brockton, Massachusetts.

* Trudy Carpenter is a professor of English at Lansing Community College in Lansing, Michigan.

Your turn to Add to this debate!


NEAHigher Ed.NEA Search

Advocate OnlineResearch CenterPublicationsPolicies & Programs
NCHENEA On CampusKey SitesFeedback